This is a sample paper that received an A last year. Please take a look at how she tells the story of what she sees, how she ties it into the readings for class, and the way she cites sources. All of this is correct and this is what I hope to see from all of you.
Working in the medical field, I have
had the opportunity to interact with people of different backgrounds and social
classes. I work in a multispecialty medical practice located in uptown New
Orleans which accepts most insurance companies from private insurances to
Medicare and Medicaid. We see patients from both sides of the spectrum; some
are very wealthy, while others are low and working class patients. I have
worked in the medical field for a few years now, and before taking this
Sociology class I had never noticed certain characteristics that I have
observed lately in our patients. I have realized that someone’s social class is
revealed in many unexpected ways. My recent observations are reflective of
sociological thesis of class.
One of my observations is that
patients have very distinctive ways of interacting with one another depending
on their social class. As children, interaction with others is a very critical
part of the socialization process. It is then when we learn how to form social
ties. There is one major difference between the way children from low and
middle upper classes socialize. In her article Invisible Inequality, Annette
Lareau agrees that “middle-class children’s involvement in adult-organized
activities led to mainly weak social ties” (Lareau, 764). While low-class
children are on the street learning how to mingle with other kids, the upper
class children spend most of their time in planned activities and do not get
many opportunities to play with other children. When those children grow up,
their social class is reflected in the way they interact with other adults. I
have noticed that lower and working class patients are over all more sociable
than middle and upper class patients. When they come in the office, most lower
class patients greet the whole waiting room out loud. Some of them also strike
a conversation very easily with other patients who are perfect strangers. They
start talking about the weather and end up talking about their children, their
jobs, etc. To someone just coming in, they seem like old friends. On the other
hand, middle class and wealthy patient are not as sociable towards other
patients. They are pretty quiet and reserved. Most of these patients bring a
book or pick up a magazine and quietly wait to be called. I have only witnessed
wealthy patients start a conversation with other patients that are their acquaintances,
never with people they do not know.
Another difference between lower and
middle class patients, especially the elderly ones, is their interaction with
family members. Family ties are important to everyone, but particularly lower
class families. They depend on each other as a support network to survive
poverty. “Working-class and poor families were…much more likely than their
middle-class counterparts to see or speak with kin daily” (Lareau, 765). These
interactions strengthen their relationships. I have observed these strong ties
prove very valuable, especially when it comes to elderly patients. Most
low-class elderly patients are brought in by family members, not only by their
immediate family like a son or a daughter, but also extended family like a
niece or a nephew. Sometimes it even becomes a family field trip. Today for
example we had an elderly patient that came in with her middle-aged daughter,
and three great-grandchildren. It is very rare to see elderly low-class
patients come in by themselves. The opposite is true with upper and middle
class elderly patients. Some of them come in with their spouse or a family
member, but many of them are by themselves. Also many of them come in with
hired help, or are brought in from nursing homes.
The last major difference I have
noticed is the patient’s compliance with medications and medical procedures in
relation to their social class. Low-class patients are not very compliant when
it comes to taking their medication. Part of the problem is that they cannot
always afford their medicine. Since Medicaid (the free government insurance for
low-income patients) only covers five prescriptions a month, very often
patients have to choose between paying their utilities and buying their
medicine. Another problem is that these patients do not always understand the
doctor’s instructions on how or when to take a new medication, or which test
needs to be done before their next visit. Even if they do not fully understand,
they usually seem intimidated and do not ask for clarification. They “seem wary
of supplying the doctor with accurate information” (Lareau, 769). Upper-middle
class patients are the complete opposite. They are not intimidated by the
doctor’s authority. They ask questions and make sure they understand the
instructions before leaving the office. This is a behavior that is taught to
upper middle-class children when they are young. This is illustrated in
Invisible Inequality in the conversation between the middle-class mother and
son when she tells him “…you should be thinking of any questions you might want
to ask the doctor. You can ask him anything you want. Don’t be shy” (Lareau,
766).
In conclusion, among other things, I
have come to realize that some of the consequences of being middle upper class
are not always great; as well as some of the consequences of being low or
working social class are not all horrible. Upper and middle-class elderly
patients have the economic resources that they need but most of them are very
much alone. They don’t have a network of relatives who are there for them in
their older years. Since they do not have a close relationship with their
extended family, and their kids are too busy working and cultivating their own
children, many of them end up alone or in nursing homes. On the other hand,
lower-class patients do not have the monetary resources but they have a network
of relatives that take care of them. Their relatives do not have much to offer,
but more importantly, they offer themselves.
Bibliography
Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible Inequality: Social
Class and Childrearing in Black Families and White Families. American
Sociological Review , 747-776.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.